[FFmpeg-devel] [FFmpeg-cvslog] lavc: add new API for iterating codecs and codec parsers
Muhammad Faiz
mfcc64 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 10 12:13:10 EET 2018
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Michael Niedermayer
<michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 10:21:04PM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:53 PM, James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 2/9/2018 7:56 AM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> >> <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
>> >>>> Josh de Kock (2018-02-06):
>> >>>>> ffmpeg | branch: master | Josh de Kock <josh at itanimul.li> | Fri Dec 22 22:17:00 2017 +0000| [7e8eba2d8755962d9dca5eade57bf8f591a73c0c] | committer: Josh de Kock
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> lavc: add new API for iterating codecs and codec parsers
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Based on an unfinished patch by atomnuker.
>> >>>
>> >>> This commit also breaks
>> >>>
>> >>> ./configure --enable-libsoxr && make -j12 fate-checkasm
>> >>> make -j12 fate-checkasm
>> >>> ...
>> >>> LD tests/checkasm/checkasm
>> >>> libswresample/libswresample.a(soxr_resample.o): In function `get_out_samples':
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:118: undefined reference to `soxr_delay'
>> >>> libswresample/libswresample.a(soxr_resample.o): In function `get_delay':
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:100: undefined reference to `soxr_delay'
>> >>> libswresample/libswresample.a(soxr_resample.o): In function `flush':
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:70: undefined reference to `soxr_delay'
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:72: undefined reference to `soxr_process'
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:77: undefined reference to `soxr_process'
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:78: undefined reference to `soxr_delay'
>> >>> libswresample/libswresample.a(soxr_resample.o): In function `process':
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:88: undefined reference to `soxr_set_num_channels'
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:88: undefined reference to `soxr_set_error'
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:90: undefined reference to `soxr_process'
>> >>> libswresample/libswresample.a(soxr_resample.o): In function `destroy':
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:65: undefined reference to `soxr_delete'
>> >>> libswresample/libswresample.a(soxr_resample.o): In function `create':
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:46: undefined reference to `soxr_io_spec'
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:48: undefined reference to `soxr_quality_spec'
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:56: undefined reference to `soxr_delete'
>> >>> ffmpeg/libswresample/soxr_resample.c:57: undefined reference to `soxr_create'
>> >>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>> >>> make: *** [tests/checkasm/checkasm] Error 1
>> >>
>> >> Fixed in 81d6501be77b273053a66eeced94d78e2021f1d1
>> >>
>> >> Thank's.
>> >
>> > This is not a proper solution. swr is pulled by avcodec only if Opus
>> > decoder is enabled. There's no reason to hardcode it for checkasm otherwise.
>> > The problem here is that the Makefile should pull all the dependencies
>> > of its hardcoded dependencies. This is what FFLIBS and FFEXTRALIBS do in
>> > common.mak to link the actual libraries.
>>
>> Probably, this is not a proper solution, but it is trivial enough.
>> (I'm sorry that I pushed it without posting).
>> So, please fix it with the proper solution. Probably, by adding
>> swresample-extralibs to avcodec-extralibs when avcodec has dependency
>> to swresample. I don't know how to do it.
>>
>
>> >
>> > That said, was this really a regression generated by this commit? It
>> > looks unrelated.
>>
>> Actually, it was a bug even before this commit. Just, previously it
>> was hidden because linker was smart enough to discard unneeded
>> dependency. But now when the list is changed to array, the linker is
>> unable to do it.
>
> iam not sure i understand correctly. But does this mean that
> tools/target_dec_"codec"_fuzzer will now include everything and not just
> the "codec" ?
> If so this will possibly prevent FFmpeg from being tested in googles ossfuzz
> framework. As their diskspace was already rather tight.
>
> i do see on my disk that the more recently build fuzzers have gottem MUCH
> larger:
> -rwxr-x--- 1 michael michael 17588987 Feb 3 18:53 tools/target_dec_scpr_fuzzer*
> -rwxr-x--- 1 michael michael 17476326 Feb 4 02:16 tools/target_dec_paf_video_fuzzer*
> -rwxr-x--- 1 michael michael 143210465 Feb 9 13:53 tools/target_dec_h264_fuzzer*
> -rwxr-x--- 1 michael michael 143210465 Feb 9 13:56 tools/target_dec_vp3_fuzzer*
>
Does the attached patch fix the problem?
Thank's.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-tools-target_dec_fuzzer-don-t-use-avcodec_register.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1053 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20180210/386e57f2/attachment.bin>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list