[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2] doc/bitstream_filters: correct dump_extra bsfs docs.

[Jun Zhao]

On 2018/3/4 6:16, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 07:10:48PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 3/3/2018 6:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 08:16:11AM +0800, Jun Zhao wrote:
>>>>  bitstream_filters.texi |   11 ++++++-----
>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>> 27c05404d9fabe5065e418c4cc09629d53aee1a1  0001-doc-bitstream_filters-correct-dump_extra-bsfs-docs.patch
>>>> From 0a0a10824511ef9d5b3c49ee652a918603841826 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao at intel.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:53:05 +0800
>>>> Subject: [PATCH V2] doc/bitstream_filters: correct dump_extra bsfs docs.
>>>>
>>>> Update dump_extra bit stream filter docs to follow current
>>>> code implement.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao at intel.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Steven Liu <lq at onvideo.cn>
>>>> ---
>>>>  doc/bitstream_filters.texi | 11 ++++++-----
>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>> i  hoped a little that the a option could one day be
>>> cleanly restored in the implementation.
>>> but keeping the docs incorrect is not helping
>> You mean adding it as it's defined in the removed portion of the doxy
>> from this patch (local_header flag2)?
>> Sounds like a better idea, as it would help replace the
>> av_parser_change() call in ffmpeg.c with this bsf. I'll take a look.
> yes
Now, we can get specific help/option information for
decoder/encoder/demuxer/muxer/filter
like this:  ffmpeg -h encoder=libx264, how about implement specific bsf
help like
ffmpeg -h bsf=dump_filter? I think even if the guys forget update the
man-page, we
can get correct option information from cmd.

If is Ok, I will try to work for this. Thanks.
>
> [...]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel