[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] lavc/qsvdec: Add VP9 decoder support

[Li, Zhong]

> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org] On Behalf
> Of James Almer
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 10:19 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] lavc/qsvdec: Add VP9 decoder
> support
> 
> On 6/26/2019 3:00 AM, Li, Zhong wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org] On
> Behalf
> >> Of Li, Zhong
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 10:32 AM
> >> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> >> <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] lavc/qsvdec: Add VP9
> >> decoder support
> >>
> >>> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org] On
> >> Behalf
> >>> Of Mark Thompson
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:40 AM
> >>> To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> >>> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] lavc/qsvdec: Add VP9 decoder
> >>> support
> >>>
> >>> From: Zhong Li <zhong.li at intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> VP9 decoder is supported on Intel kabyLake+ platforms with MSDK
> >>> Version 1.19+
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhong Li <zhong.li at intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> On 20/03/2019 14:41, Li, Zhong wrote:
> >>>> Yes, QSV is a marketing name which is no equal to libmfx/MSDK.
> >>>> But would be better to keep consistent with others, such as "Intel
> >>> QSV-accelerated VP8 video decoding" in pervious changelog?
> >>>
> >>> I don't think so?  VP9 decoding with the QSV hardware is already
> >>> supported, this only adds the additional option of using libmfx to
> >>> access the same thing as well.
> >>
> >> Ok, here are just some words description of changelog. I will be
> >> happy to see this patch can be applied.
> >> (As previous comment, the updated version of vp9 parser with pic_type
> >> of key frame issue fixing LGTM.)
> >
> > Ping?
> >
> > If nobody against, I will merge it with cbs vp9 parser patch during one
> week.
> 
> Please, don't push a patchset written by Mark without his approval. I
> reviewed a few other patches from this set and he will most likely submit a
> new version for all of them.

Thanks for your remind, James. Yes I saw your comment for av1, I thought the others should be ok but pending for a while. 
Anyway, will hold on and waiting for Mark's response.