[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavfi/telecine: Mark telecined frames as interlaced

Paul B Mahol onemda at gmail.com
Sun Apr 12 11:37:59 EEST 2020


On 4/11/20, Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/11/20, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Am Sa., 11. Apr. 2020 um 15:10 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol
>> <onemda at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> On 4/11/20, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffmpeg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 02:05 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> > <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> >> Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 01:02 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> >> <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Am Sa., 4. Apr. 2020 um 00:44 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> >> > <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Am Sa., 4. Apr. 2020 um 00:40 Uhr schrieb James Almer
>>> >> > > <jamrial at gmail.com>:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > On 4/3/2020 6:37 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> >> > > > > Am Fr., 3. Apr. 2020 um 23:19 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos
>>> >> > > > > <ceffmpeg at gmail.com>:
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > >> Attached patch marks actually telecined frames as
>>> >> > > > >> interlaced,
>>> >> > > > >> other frames as progressive.
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > New patch with changes to fate attached.
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > Please comment, Carl Eugen
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > Those yadif tests look wrong. The patch shouldn't affect them.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Clearly, thank you!
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > New patch attached, it should now only change the telecined
>>> >> > > frames and leave the other frames as they are, the setfield
>>> >> > > filter can be used to force a progressive setting for them.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > New patch attached that also sets top_field_first
>>> >>
>>> >> Which had the effect that fate is correct again, new patch attached.
>>> >
>>> > Patch applied.
>>> >
>>>
>>> This was never approved by me.
>>
>> You reviewed it on irc and correctly pointed out the missing bits.
>
> Lies, I was against that idea from start.
>
>>
>>> So revert it ASAP!
>>
>> What should be changed about it?
>
> Return of code as it was before this pointless change.
> I see no good out of it.

I gonna revert this ASAP!


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list