[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avformat/dv: allow returning damaged audio

Marton Balint cus at passwd.hu
Mon Aug 3 23:38:21 EEST 2020



On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, Dave Rice wrote:

>
>
>> On Aug 1, 2020, at 5:26 PM, Marton Balint <cus at passwd.hu> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 07:28:53PM +0200, Marton Balint wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Fixes: Ticket8762
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> libavformat/dv.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> If "dv remux loses sync", then the timestamps should be fixed, not
>>>> additional packets should be generated based on previously read packet data
>>>> (which is a fragile approach to begin with, e.g. what if the first frame is
>>>> the corrupt one?).
>>> 
>>> Ticket8762 is about stream copy, so if no packets are returned for audio
>>> but are for video and just timestamps are updated this would at least on
>>> its own probably not work that well.
>> 
>> If the timestamps are good, a good player should be able to play it 
>> correctly, even if audio stream is sparse.
>> 
>> None of the demuxers generate packets because the timestamps are not 
>> continous, I just don't think it would be consistent if DV suddenly 
>> started to do this. E.g. what if the user wants to drop video with no 
>> audio?
>
> In practice, when dv frames with video and no audio are interleaved 
> within a dv stream that otherwise has both, it is because the playback 
> videotape player of the dv tape is in pause mode or the tape is damaged. 
> These frames most common are filled with only video dif blocks that note 
> concealment (so the image is a copy of a prior image) and the audio 
> source pack metadata is missing, but the paylock of the audio dif blocks 
> are filled with error code so they would decode as silence.

But if the audio source pack metadata is missing, then how can you 
determine the audio settings? Or the number of samples the errornous 
frame contains (e.g. 1600 v.s 1602)?

At least can you assume that audio settings are the same throughout a 
recording? Or DV can have mid-stream audio setting changes?

>
> I did a test of 114 dv tape transfers
> 	61 no difference in demuxing between pass and drop (using this patch)
> 	31 the difference is only in the final frames so the impact of the demuxer option would be hard for the user to see, no loss of sync, just video with no audio at the end
> 	22 the difference occurs mid-stream, with the drop option the demuxer outputs video and audio at different rate when hitting frames with no audio source pack, so the output of the demuxer loses sync
>
>>> about the case of a damaged first frame. Do you have a testcase ?
>> 
>> No, but it can happen, can't it? If the stream starts with no audio for 1 second you will have 1 second A-V desync, as far as I see, that is why I believe fixing the timestamps is the proper fix.
>
> Yes this happens (though it is more rare and didn’t occur in the test 
> noted above). In that case, ffmpeg shows no audio at all and I’d have to 
> read the stream at later frames using -skip_initial_bytes.

I guess this should be fixed as well, although if there is no way to 
determine the audio settings, this might prove to be difficult. Maybe the 
probing should keep reading the file until an audio source pack is found 
and cache that instead of relying on the last pack? At least that would 
give you more consistent results, irrespective of the order of 
reads/seeks, etc. But this can only work if audio settings are the same 
throughout a file, can we assume that?

Also maybe setting the CORRUPT packet flag should be done in this case?

Regards,
Marton



>
>> Regards,
>> Marton
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org <mailto:ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
>> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>
>> 
>> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
>> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org> with subject "unsubscribe".
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list