[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

[Paul B Mahol]

On 7/31/20, Nicolas George <george at nsup.org> wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31):
>> Disagree, no it does not, also only you complained about it.
>
> Do not push this patch unless the origin of all these numbers is
> properly documented in the source code.
>
> I am ready to argue, but I will not spend more text than you on it.

Always when you appear you must evoke your request that must be
fulfilled at any costs no matter how useless they are.

No existing encoder/decoder document their tables and how they got it,
unless they are part of existing specification, which in this case it
is not.