[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] encoder profile validation

Anton Khirnov anton at khirnov.net
Wed May 20 12:32:36 EEST 2020


Quoting Marton Balint (2020-05-20 10:35:07)
> 
> 
> On Wed, 20 May 2020, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> 
> > Quoting Marton Balint (2020-05-18 20:32:53)
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Mon, 18 May 2020, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Quoting Marton Balint (2020-05-16 15:52:22)
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> 
> >> >> As you may know, a recent patchset enabled AVCodecContext->profile 
> >> >> constants to reside in encoders.
> >> >> 
> >> >> In order to make a full transition to avctx->profile even in existing 
> >> >> encoders which might use a private profile setting, we have to make sure 
> >> >> only supported avctx->profile values are passed to encoders.
> >> >> 
> >> >> The fact that avctx->profile is not validated is already an issue, and 
> >> >> assertions/segmentation faults can already happen in existing encoders 
> >> >> (e.g.: aac, mpeg) if unsupported values are passed.
> >> >> 
> >> >> AVCodec have a .profiles attribute which supposed to contain the list of 
> >> >> supported profiles. However this is problematic because
> >> >> - AVCodecContext->profile is not validated against this list
> >> >> - not all encoders define the list
> >> >> - even if there is a list it might be defined as NULL_IF_CONFIG_SMALL
> >> >> - some encoders support more or less than its currently defined list
> >> >
> >> > All of these sound like bugs that can and should be fixed.
> >> >
> >> >> - AVCodec->profiles contains AVProfiles which supposed to have a textual
> >> >>    representation of each profile, which can cause profile name
> >> >>    duplications/inconsistencies against libavcodec/profiles.c if the list
> >> >>    is different to the one in codecs profile list.
> >> >
> >> > Why should it be different? Isn't that a bug that should be fixed?
> >> 
> >> The list can be different because possibly not all the profiles which are 
> >> recognized by the decoder is supported by the encoder. Also the encoder 
> >> can define pseudo profiles which it can support, for example the AAC 
> >> encoders have support for FF_PROFILE_MPEG2_AAC_LOW which is LC profile 
> >> with some features disabled.
> >
> > Don't understand - I would think AVCodec.profiles would list the
> > profiles supported by that specific AVCodec instance. Is that not the
> > case?
> 
> Yes, but you cannot share AVProfile lists among encoders or decoders of 
> the same codec because they support different profiles.

Sure, but how is that relevant to the issue in question?
Every decoder or encoder would just have its own profiles list. Am I
missing something?

-- 
Anton Khirnov


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list