[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/7] avcodec/h264dec: prefer to use variable instead of type for sizeof

[mypopy at gmail.com]

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 9:58 PM <lance.lmwang at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang at gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang at gmail.com>
> ---
>  libavcodec/h264dec.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/h264dec.c b/libavcodec/h264dec.c
> index 974d324..d5b3df3 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/h264dec.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/h264dec.c
> @@ -185,17 +185,17 @@ int ff_h264_alloc_tables(H264Context *h)
>      const int slice_tsize = big_mb_num + h->mb_stride;
>      int x, y;
>
> -    if (!(h->intra4x4_pred_mode     = av_mallocz_array(row_mb_num * 8, sizeof(uint8_t)))                ||
> -        !(h->non_zero_count         = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num * 48, sizeof(uint8_t)))               ||
> +    if (!(h->intra4x4_pred_mode     = av_mallocz_array(row_mb_num * 8, sizeof(*h->intra4x4_pred_mode))) ||
> +        !(h->non_zero_count         = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num * 48, sizeof(*h->non_zero_count)))    ||
>          !(h->slice_table_base       = av_mallocz_array(slice_tsize, sizeof(*h->slice_table_base)))      ||
> -        !(h->cbp_table              = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(uint16_t)))                   ||
> -        !(h->chroma_pred_mode_table = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(uint8_t)))                    ||
> -        !(h->mvd_table[0]           = av_mallocz_array(row_mb_num * 8, sizeof(uint8_t)))                ||
> -        !(h->mvd_table[1]           = av_mallocz_array(row_mb_num * 8, sizeof(uint8_t)))                ||
> -        !(h->direct_table           = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num * 4, sizeof(uint8_t)))                ||
> -        !(h->list_counts            = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(uint8_t)))                    ||
> -        !(h->mb2b_xy                = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(uint32_t)))                   ||
> -        !(h->mb2br_xy               = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(uint32_t))))
> +        !(h->cbp_table              = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(*h->cbp_table)))              ||
> +        !(h->chroma_pred_mode_table = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(*h->chroma_pred_mode_table))) ||
> +        !(h->mvd_table[0]           = av_mallocz_array(row_mb_num * 8, sizeof(*h->mvd_table[0])))       ||
> +        !(h->mvd_table[1]           = av_mallocz_array(row_mb_num * 8, sizeof(*h->mvd_table[1])))       ||
> +        !(h->direct_table           = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num * 4, sizeof(*h->direct_table)))       ||
> +        !(h->list_counts            = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(*h->list_counts)))            ||
> +        !(h->mb2b_xy                = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(*h->mb2b_xy)))                ||
> +        !(h->mb2br_xy               = av_mallocz_array(big_mb_num, sizeof(*h->mb2br_xy))))
>          return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
>      h->slice_ctx[0].intra4x4_pred_mode = h->intra4x4_pred_mode;
>      h->slice_ctx[0].mvd_table[0] = h->mvd_table[0];
> @@ -252,10 +252,10 @@ int ff_h264_slice_context_init(H264Context *h, H264SliceContext *sl)
>          er->b8_stride   = h->mb_width * 2 + 1;
>
>          // error resilience code looks cleaner with this
> -        if (!(er->mb_index2xy        = av_mallocz_array(h->mb_num + 1, sizeof(int)))                   ||
> -            !(er->error_status_table = av_mallocz_array(mb_array_size, sizeof(uint8_t)))               ||
> -            !(er->er_temp_buffer     = av_mallocz_array(h->mb_height * h->mb_stride + 1, sizeof(int))) ||
> -            !(sl->dc_val_base        = av_mallocz_array(yc_size, sizeof(int16_t))))
> +        if (!(er->mb_index2xy        = av_mallocz_array(h->mb_num + 1, sizeof(*er->mb_index2xy)))                      ||
> +            !(er->error_status_table = av_mallocz_array(mb_array_size, sizeof(*er->error_status_table)))               ||
> +            !(er->er_temp_buffer     = av_mallocz_array(h->mb_height * h->mb_stride + 1, sizeof(*er->er_temp_buffer))) ||
> +            !(sl->dc_val_base        = av_mallocz_array(yc_size, sizeof(*sl->dc_val_base))))
>              return AVERROR(ENOMEM); // ff_h264_free_tables will clean up for us
>
>          for (y = 0; y < h->mb_height; y++)
> --
Do you have any special reason to use 2 patches (patch 3-4) and don't
combine patch 3-4 as one patch?   And I don't think splitting this
step as 2 patches will help code-review

The other thing is, I can't find this change for what special reasons