[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 1/4] avutil/{avstring, bprint}: add XML escaping from ffprobe to avutil
Jan Ekström
jeebjp at gmail.com
Mon Feb 1 14:17:26 EET 2021
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:52 PM Nicolas George <george at nsup.org> wrote:
>
> Jan Ekström (12021-02-01):
> > I beg to differ, since it seemed to fully implement the cases noted in
> > 2.4. Does escape double and single quotes unnecessarily in some cases,
> > yes. But not invalid.
>
> Not invalid, but not good enough.
>
> > https://github.com/jeeb/ffmpeg/commits/ttml_encoder_v5
> >
> > - I changed "quoted" to "quotes".
>
> I strongly suggest you merge the commits, but I will not block on it.
>
> > - I kept the names matching to the spec, esp. due to the definitions
> > in the spec in 2.3 and 2.4, as well as kept the fact that it is
> > escaping for the actual value of the attribute, not just "the
> > attribute".
>
> "ATT_VALUE" is a terrible part of the name, virtually impossible to
> memorize. Nobody learns the names used by the XML spec by rote. Call
> these modes:
>
> AV_ESCAPE_MODE_XML
> AV_ESCAPE_MODE_XML_DOUBLE_QUOTES
> AV_ESCAPE_MODE_XML_SINGLE_QUOTES
>
> and be done with it.
>
> This is a public API, it needs to be good immediately.
>
I fear that those sound way, way too generic. "This escapes all XML"
definitely is not what that does.
And yes, even if it has the better definition in the Doxygen comment.
> > - I removed the double and single quote escaping from the CHAR_DATA
> > escaping, as you requested.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> > For the record, I have no great interest in XML. If you wish to take
> > this stuff further, please do so. But at this point I am feeling
> > rather stumped that after the initial reviews which actually were
> > concerned of code that I wrote, most of the comments have been
> > regarding things that were already there in the code base.
>
> As for me, I am quite stumped that you wasted your time arguing
> something you have no great interest in, instead of just following
> advice and be done with it.
>
Well, my first reaction is to attempt to validate your requests. Then
when I'm not easily capable of doing that I become annoyed because
this code is not what I came here to receive change requests that I
cannot easily apply without blindly trusting you. Which I have done,
but only because that seems to have been the course of least
resistance. But yet, this is where we are.
Jan
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list