[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v3] Tech Resolution Process

[Lynne]

Feb 10, 2021, 14:34 by anton at khirnov.net:

> Quoting Lynne (2021-02-10 14:15:29)
>
>> Feb 10, 2021, 11:45 by anton at khirnov.net:
>>
>> > Quoting Lynne (2021-02-08 20:13:39)
>> >
>> >> Feb 8, 2021, 15:23 by jb at videolan.org:
>> >> > +
>> >> > +The decisions from the TC are final, until the matters are reopened after
>> >> > +no less than one year, by either the GA or the TC auto-seizing.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Is there an OR there? Can the question be raised again after more than
>> >> a year by anyone, OR at any time by either the GA or the TC?
>> >>
>> >
>> > I'd say after more than a year through the normal process. So best to
>> > drop the part after the comma to avoid confusion.
>> >
>>
>> I think an OR should be added. The TC or GA should be able to say
>> "oh, we really screwed it up, now it turns out we absolutely need this"
>> without waiting a full year.
>>
>
> It's redundant. GA can already vote on whatever it wants, all the rules
> exist only because GA agrees on them.
> And the cases of "we fucked up bad, absolutely need to change this"
> should be rare enough to not need a special rule.
>

Oh, sorry, I misread it as "drop the comma".
If the part after the comma is removed the document looks good to me.