[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fftools/ffmpeg: Fix declaration-after-statement warning

[Gyan Doshi]

On 2021-07-19 00:53, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Andreas Rheinhardt:
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt at outlook.com>
>> ---
>> What is actually the reason that we stick to this C90 rule?
>> Is it because of compability with ancient compilers? (Given that we
>> already require several C99 features, I doubt that there are compilers
>> which would fail if we stopped adhering to the
>> declaration-before-statement rule.) Or is it because it is presumed that
>> it improves clarity and readability?
>>
> I pushed this to fix the warning, although I'd like to hear other
> peoples' opinion on whether the warning should no longer be enabled.

Other than those compilers adhering to older standards, is there any 
rationale for it?

Regards,
Gyan

>
>>   fftools/ffmpeg.c | 7 ++++---
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fftools/ffmpeg.c b/fftools/ffmpeg.c
>> index e0f2fe138f..6f6e002604 100644
>> --- a/fftools/ffmpeg.c
>> +++ b/fftools/ffmpeg.c
>> @@ -4234,10 +4234,11 @@ static int get_input_packet(InputFile *f, AVPacket **pkt)
>>           float scale = f->rate_emu ? 1.0 : f->readrate;
>>           for (i = 0; i < f->nb_streams; i++) {
>>               InputStream *ist = input_streams[f->ist_index + i];
>> +            int64_t stream_ts_offset, pts, now;
>>               if (!ist->nb_packets) continue;
>> -            int64_t stream_ts_offset = FFMAX(ist->first_dts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE ? ist->first_dts : 0, file_start);
>> -            int64_t pts = av_rescale(ist->dts, 1000000, AV_TIME_BASE);
>> -            int64_t now = (av_gettime_relative() - ist->start)*scale + stream_ts_offset;
>> +            stream_ts_offset = FFMAX(ist->first_dts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE ? ist->first_dts : 0, file_start);
>> +            pts = av_rescale(ist->dts, 1000000, AV_TIME_BASE);
>> +            now = (av_gettime_relative() - ist->start) * scale + stream_ts_offset;
>>               if (pts > now)
>>                   return AVERROR(EAGAIN);
>>           }
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".