[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v16 01/16] global: Prepare AVFrame for subtitle handling

[Soft Works]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Anton
> Khirnov
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2021 10:01 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v16 01/16] global: Prepare AVFrame for
> subtitle handling
> 
> Quoting Soft Works (2021-11-26 19:25:17)
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Anton
> > > Khirnov
> > > Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 5:21 PM
> > > To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v16 01/16] global: Prepare AVFrame for
> > > subtitle handling
> > >
> > > You have completely disregarded my comments on the previous patch. Stop
> > > doing that, it is rude.
> >
> > I value everyone's time taken to review the patches I'm submitting.
> > Rest assured that I'm going over every single comment and try to address
> > each one appropriately.
> >
> > I think you misunderstood because I had answered one of your comments
> > immediately. Right now I'm re-working the patchset to address all
> suggestions
> > and eventually I'll respond to all those that I haven't addressed,
> > explaining why.
> 
> Okay, but in the interest of preventing such misunderstandings in the
> future you could mention these facts somewhere. E.g. right after the
> commit message, and/or put [RFC]/[WIP] in the subject. Otherwise people
> assume that every patch is intended to be pushed to master as-is.

That wasn't the point. All of the recent releases were intended to be 
pushed as-is.

I had quickly responded to one part of your comment, even before I got
through all in detail.

That's all ;-)

I apologize when it has created a bad impression for you. It wasn't intended.

sw