[FFmpeg-devel] Scaling PAL8 images with alpha
Soft Works
softworkz at hotmail.com
Sat Sep 25 19:05:19 EEST 2021
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Paul B Mahol
> Sent: Saturday, 25 September 2021 17:51
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Scaling PAL8 images with alpha
>
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:46 PM Soft Works <softworkz at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> > > Michael Niedermayer
> > > Sent: Saturday, 25 September 2021 16:30
> > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> > > devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Scaling PAL8 images with alpha
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 10:23:56AM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:00 AM Soft Works
> <softworkz at hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On
> Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > > > Soft Works
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, 24 September 2021 19:03
> > > > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> > > > > > devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Scaling PAL8 images with alpha
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On
> > > Behalf Of
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > Niedermayer
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, 24 September 2021 17:40
> > > > > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> > > > > > devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Scaling PAL8 images with
> alpha
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:30:31AM +0000, Soft Works
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > for a new filter, I want to rescale PAL8 subtitle
> bitmaps
> > > where
> > > > > > the palette
> > > > > > > includes
> > > > > > > > colors with alpha.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From what I’ve seen, swscale doesn’t support PAL8-to-
> PAL8,
> > > only
> > > > > > PAL8-to-
> > > > > > > BGR8
> > > > > > > > which doesn’t support alpha and the palette is fixed
> with
> > > 256
> > > > > > entries
> > > > > > > defined by
> > > > > > > > convention, while I would ideally like to be able to
> allow
> > > the
> > > > > > following:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - constrain the output to use the same palette as the
> input
> > > > > > > > - adaptively quantize it to a palette with a
> configurable
> > > number
> > > > > > of colors
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thus it's about the palette quantization (with or
> without
> > > > > > dithering) after
> > > > > > > > scaling in RGBA. (or some cool algorithmic trick I'm
> not
> > > aware
> > > > > > of)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is there any existing code that I could reuse? The
> closest
> > > I
> > > > > > could find
> > > > > > > > is pngenc, but I'm wondering whether there's something
> > > > > > else/better
> > > > > > > > somewhere in the ffmpeg libs that I haven't seen?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are some non linear scaling filters which may make
> > > sense when
> > > > > > you do
> > > > > > > not have the full linear space available see:
> > > > > > > hqx, epx, xbr
> > > > > > > you could also try some neural net stuff
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Photoshop can perfectly do what is needed, but their
> algorithms
> > > are
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > public.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've put a few thing together to illustrate what I'm talking
> > > about:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://gist.github.com/softworkz/deef5c2a43d3d629c3e17f9e21544a8f
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Meanwhile I found what I need:
> > > https://github.com/ImageOptim/libimagequant
> > > > >
> > > > > Interestingly, they are comparing their lib specifically to
> the
> > > > > Photoshop feature that I mentioned:
> > > https://pngquant.org/vsphotoshop.html
> > > > > In the 2000's, the PS implementation for image quantization,
> > > optimization
> > > > > and compression (profanely named "Save for Web") had remained
> > > > > unparalleled for years, that's why it was one of my first
> > > thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > I hadn't heard about libimagequant before, but it seems to do
> > > exactly
> > > > > what is needed for rescaling PAL8 to PAL8 at a high quality.
> > > > >
> > > > > Before spending any time on it, I wanted ask whether that
> library
> > > > > would be acceptable for adding it as a (GPLv3) reference to
> the
> > > > > project and as a dependency to my filter?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > External dependencies for what is supposed to be a rather base
> > > feature
> > > > are not ideal.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > i see no reason why this would need an external dependancy
> > > we have filters implementing much more complex things than
> scaling a
> > > pal8
> > > image
> >
> > I dislike GPL3 as well and needing a library for this might
> > seem to be a bit too much for solving the problem.
> > I'm just not sure whether it can be solved easily. I mean it
> > can easily be solved in a basic way, but I'm not sure whether
> > it would be possible to achieve the same quality in results.
> >
> > I've put up here some examples and also a comparison of results
> > from palettegen+paletteuse and Photoshop(which I assume to
> > be at the same level of quality like libimagequant).
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/softworkz/deef5c2a43d3d629c3e17f9e21544a8f
> >
> >
> > Earlier versions of the library were published under a BSD-like
> > license. Assuming it would do the job, would it be possible
> > to include that code? (I'm not an expert in these things)
> >
> >
> So this is actually same thing? Why not improve existing filters in
> libavfilter instead?
I like to keep my work area focused and want to avoid getting
lost in peripheral subjects.
> Not friendly to include duplicated code just to have some random
> feature.
I understand what you mean, yet it wouldn't be duplicating,
rather adopting.
But fair enough - I'll give it a try and see which results
I can achieve by extending palleteuse/palettegen.
Thanks,
softworkz
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list