[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] libavutil: Add av_visibility_hidden for setting hidden symbol visibility
Timo Rothenpieler
timo at rothenpieler.org
Mon Jul 11 19:51:56 EEST 2022
On 11.07.2022 16:26, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Henrik Gramner:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:19 AM Martin Storsjö <martin at martin.st> wrote:
>>> +#if (AV_GCC_VERSION_AT_LEAST(4,0) || defined(__clang__)) && (defined(__ELF__) || defined(__MACH__))
>>> +# define av_visibility_hidden __attribute__((visibility("hidden")))
>>> +#else
>>> +# define av_visibility_hidden
>>> +#endif
>>
>> The usual approach is to compile with -fvisibility=hidden and
>> explicitly flag exported API symbols.
>>
>> Is there a reason for doing this the other way around?
>
> -fvisibility=hidden only affects the visibility of symbols defined in
> the currently compiled translation unit. It does not allow the compiler
> to make assumptions about external declarations that are used in this
> translation unit (in other words, it has to presume the worst: That it
> comes from a different DSO). E.g. this is ff_rdft_end on 32bit x86 if
> ff_fft_end is declared with an explicit hidden attribute:
>
> 000000bb <ff_rdft_end>:
>
> bb: 83 44 24 04 18 addl $0x18,0x4(%esp)
>
> c0: e9 fc ff ff ff jmp c1 <ff_rdft_end+0x6>
>
> c1: R_386_PC32 ff_fft_end
>
>
> And this is the same function if one uses -fvisibility=hidden instead of
> the attribute:
>
> 000000bb <ff_rdft_end>:
>
> bb: 53 push %ebx
>
> bc: e8 fc ff ff ff call bd <ff_rdft_end+0x2>
>
> bd: R_386_PC32 __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx
>
> c1: 81 c3 02 00 00 00 add $0x2,%ebx
>
> c3: R_386_GOTPC _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
>
> c7: 83 ec 14 sub $0x14,%esp
>
> ca: 8b 44 24 1c mov 0x1c(%esp),%eax
>
> ce: 83 c0 18 add $0x18,%eax
>
> d1: 50 push %eax
>
> d2: e8 fc ff ff ff call d3 <ff_rdft_end+0x18>
>
> d3: R_386_PLT32 ff_fft_end
>
> d7: 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%esp
>
> da: 5b pop %ebx
>
> db: c3 ret
>
>
> The code is the same as if one had not used -fvisibility=hidden at all.
>
> Of course, adding the attribute to every function/object is way too much
> effort; that's why the pragma exists.
Is this still true if you also add -fno-semantic-interposition?
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list