[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] swscale/swscale_unscaled: Fix undefined NULL + 0
Michael Niedermayer
michael at niedermayer.cc
Wed Sep 28 22:39:25 EEST 2022
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 08:39:09PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Affected the fitsdec-gbrp16 FATE-test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt at outlook.com>
> ---
> libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c b/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c
> index 8838cc8b53..0b97377934 100644
> --- a/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c
> +++ b/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c
> @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static void packed16togbra16(const uint8_t *src, int srcStride,
> }
> }
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> - dst[i] += dstStride[i] >> 1;
> + dst[i] = FF_PTR_ADD(dst[i], dstStride[i] >> 1);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -729,8 +729,8 @@ static int Rgb16ToPlanarRgb16Wrapper(SwsContext *c, const uint8_t *src[],
> }
>
> for(i=0; i<4; i++) {
> - dst2013[i] += stride2013[i] * srcSliceY / 2;
> - dst1023[i] += stride1023[i] * srcSliceY / 2;
> + dst2013[i] = FF_PTR_ADD(dst2013[i], stride2013[i] * srcSliceY / 2);
> + dst1023[i] = FF_PTR_ADD(dst1023[i], stride1023[i] * srcSliceY / 2);
> }
is there a reason not to check the pointer in the loop ?
as in
for (i = 0; i < 4 && dst[i]; i++)
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
"Nothing to hide" only works if the folks in power share the values of
you and everyone you know entirely and always will -- Tom Scott
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20220928/9789cc6c/attachment.sig>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list