[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4 0/4] Add passthrough support for SCTE-35

[Dennis Mungai]

On Tue, 8 Aug 2023, 17:31 Devin Heitmueller, <
devin.heitmueller at ltnglobal.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 7:16 AM Devin Heitmueller
> <devin.heitmueller at ltnglobal.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 9:38 AM Devin Heitmueller
> > <devin.heitmueller at ltnglobal.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Properly set up the MPEG-TS mux and recalculate the pts_adjust field
> > > in SCTE_35 packets, such that a user can transparently pass through
> > > SCTE-35 streams when both the input and output are MPEG-TS.
> > >
> > > This patch series updated to reflect feedback from James Almer.
> > >
> > > Devin Heitmueller (4):
> > >   avcodec: Add new side data type to contain original PTS value
> > >   mpegts: Stash original PTS for SCTE-35 sections for processing later
> > >   mpegtsenc: Add support for output of SCTE-35 streams over TS
> > >   bsf: Add new bitstream filter to set SCTE-35 pts_adjustment when
> > >     reclocking
> > >
> > >  doc/bitstream_filters.texi       |   9 ++++
> > >  libavcodec/Makefile              |   1 +
> > >  libavcodec/bitstream_filters.c   |   1 +
> > >  libavcodec/defs.h                |  12 +++++
> > >  libavcodec/packet.h              |  11 +++++
> > >  libavcodec/scte35ptsadjust_bsf.c | 100
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  libavformat/mpegts.c             |  11 ++++-
> > >  libavformat/mpegts.h             |   1 +
> > >  libavformat/mpegtsenc.c          |  76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  libavformat/mux.c                |   6 ++-
> > >  10 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 libavcodec/scte35ptsadjust_bsf.c
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> > >
> >
> > ping.
>
> If nobody has any additional feedback, could I please get somebody to
> merge this series?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Devin
>
> --
> Devin Heitmueller, Senior Software Engineer
> LTN Global Communications
> o: +1 (301) 363-1001
> w: https://ltnglobal.com  e: devin.heitmueller at ltnglobal.com



Is there anything blocking this patch(set) from bring merged upstream?

>
>