[FFmpeg-devel] Bump major version of swresample

[Michael Niedermayer]

essOn Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 12:03:02AM +0800, Wang Bin wrote:
> 

>  version_major.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> a87056c2fe65d68b2cf5d1de06be28ea40c69b73  0001-Bump-major-version-of-swresample.patch
> From e3e6a3833f2fba743ee9c05962e804e9e570dd75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: wang-bin <wbsecg1 at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 23:54:51 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Bump major version of swresample
> 
> ---
>  libswresample/version_major.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libswresample/version_major.h b/libswresample/version_major.h
> index 7f265c2073..dd13f2bbe3 100644
> --- a/libswresample/version_major.h
> +++ b/libswresample/version_major.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@
>   * Libswresample version macros
>   */
>  
> -#define LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MAJOR   4
> +#define LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MAJOR   5

No oppinion if this should be changed now before 6.0 or not
but if its done it should be done on master and release/6.0 at the same time
and LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MINOR needs to be reset too while
LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MINOR needs to be +1 on master compared to release/6.0

oppinon from others is welcome here. Iam not a user of the releases so its
hard for me to really guess which way is better. Its a little messy to
change now

thx

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Rewriting code that is poorly written but fully understood is good.
Rewriting code that one doesnt understand is a sign that one is less smart
than the original author, trying to rewrite it will not make it better.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20230227/e567096d/attachment.sig>