[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Added support for MB_INFO

Carotti, Elias eliascrt at amazon.it
Wed May 3 15:27:30 EEST 2023


Sorry to revive an old thread, but I updated the patch for ffmpeg 6 and
this new patch should address the comments.
Still this is a libx264-only patch, and provides a means to specify
that only portions of the frame have changed from the previous one
while the others should be P_SKIP-ped.

More specifically, now the data is fully contained in the side data and
the actual map of macroblocks which changed from the previous frame is
created from the side information at encoding time, much like what is
done for the region of interest.

best,
Elias


On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 17:10 +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
> and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On 17.06.2022 12:59, Carotti, Elias wrote:
> > > 
> > > Yes, exactly. It relies on x264 to free it.
> > 
> > Not really. It can rely on x264 if you explicitly want that
> > behavior.
> > If you do not set a deallocator, it remains the caller
> > responsibility.
> > 
> > > What happens if x264 is not involved, but some other encoder,
> > > which
> > > does
> > > not check for that kind of side data?
> > > 
> > > How does the caller know that the data was consumed, and the
> > > ownership
> > > passed on?
> > 
> > Again, you don't have to pass the ownership, and in fact in my use
> > case
> > I do not pass it since I actually recycle and update the same
> > buffer
> > for subsequent frames. If you do intentionally pass the ownership
> > you
> > need to be aware of what you are doing. As I said, I see a leak
> > only in
> > case of a programming error.
> > Maybe we could explicitly state it in the comment section in
> > mb_info.h:
> > if you set the deallocator you're relinquishing ownership of the
> > buffer.
> 
> I'm not sure if that's something you can sensibly do with side data?
> What if it gets buffered, copied, and so on?
> 
> > Plus, there's one more flag (b_mb_info_update) in libx264 which
> > allows
> > to pass back information to the caller about which macroblocks
> > among
> > the flagged ones were actually encoded as P_SKIP. I did not add
> > support
> > for that though but in the future somebody may want to.
> 
> Yes, it's very x264 specific.
> But the side data is generic. If for some reason x264 does not
> process a
> frame, or any other encoder ends up getting used, the data will leak
> if
> it relied on x264 to free it.
> 
> > In principle I could've put the buffer into the side information 
> > and
> > not just pass a pointer to it but I thought that it would require
> > adding more semantics which would imply a stronger dependency on
> > libx264.
> > Right now, mb_info is a vector of uint8_t flags and the only
> > possible
> > value - to date - is X264_MBINFO_CONSTANT. What if, say, one day
> > libx264 decides the buffer has to be a vector of uint16_t or still
> > uint8_t but the flags are packed? On the other hand, this, AFAIK,
> > is
> > only supported by libx264. Other codecs may want to choose a
> > different
> > semantic for a similar field and the only possibility to make it
> > generic is letting the caller handling the low level details.
> 
> I'm not aware of any other side data with a similar semantic. And I'm
> really not sure if it's sane or even valid to do it like that.
> Can't the data be entirely contained within the side data?
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".




NICE SRL, viale Monte Grappa 3/5, 20124 Milano, Italia, Registro delle Imprese di Milano Monza Brianza Lodi REA n. 2096882, Capitale Sociale: 10.329,14 EUR i.v., Cod. Fisc. e P.IVA 01133050052, Societa con Socio Unico


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Add-support-for-x264-s-MB_INFO.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 11120 bytes
Desc: 0001-Add-support-for-x264-s-MB_INFO.patch
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20230503/594eefe6/attachment.bin>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list