[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/imgutils: optimize image copy efficiency
Martin Storsjö
martin at martin.st
Thu May 4 11:22:17 EEST 2023
On Thu, 4 May 2023, xufuji456 wrote:
> It makes sense when copying 4K/8K video, if linesize
> equals to aligned linesize.
>
> Signed-off-by: xufuji456 <839789740 at qq.com>
> ---
> libavutil/imgutils.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavutil/imgutils.c b/libavutil/imgutils.c
> index 9ab5757cf6..1d432e7a57 100644
> --- a/libavutil/imgutils.c
> +++ b/libavutil/imgutils.c
> @@ -525,10 +525,17 @@ int av_image_copy_to_buffer(uint8_t *dst, int dst_size,
> const uint8_t *src = src_data[i];
> h = (height + (1 << shift) - 1) >> shift;
>
> - for (j = 0; j < h; j++) {
> - memcpy(dst, src, linesize[i]);
> - dst += FFALIGN(linesize[i], align);
> - src += src_linesize[i];
> + if (FFALIGN(linesize[i], align) == linesize[i] && src_linesize[i] == linesize[i]) {
> + int size = linesize[i] * h;
For cases like these, I would prefer to use "linesize[i] * (h - 1) + w"
instead. For cases if copying e.g. into an offsetted position within a
buffer, writing the last trailing padding would end up writing out of
bounds.
That said, I'm unsure about how much gain you get from this optimization
here - some numbers to back it up would be useful.
// Martin
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list