[FFmpeg-devel] 回复: [PATCH v1] libavfi/dnn: add Paddle Inference as one of DNN backend
WenzheWang
wongwwz at foxmail.com
Thu May 11 10:53:56 EEST 2023
Thank you for your reply and I am very glad to receive your opinion.
For me,github star is not very important, I just want to use it to highlight how many people are using deep learning frameworks right now. However, I have learned about dnn's plans for other frameworks.
I think it would be a good idea to add a glue layer and hope to see it implemented soon. Do I have the opportunity to participate in the development of this module?
Thank you again for answering my question.
best,
Wenzhe
WenzheWang
wongwwz at foxmail.com
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "FFmpeg development discussions and patches" <yejun.guo-at-intel.com at ffmpeg.org>;
发送时间: 2023年5月10日(星期三) 晚上7:30
收件人: "FFmpeg development discussions and patches"<ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>;
主题: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1] libavfi/dnn: add Paddle Inference as one of DNN backend
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> "zhilizhao(赵志立)"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:09 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1] libavfi/dnn: add Paddle Inference as
> one of DNN backend
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 2023, at 10:25, WenzheWang <wongwwz at foxmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Madam or Sir,
> >
> >
> > Hope this email finds you well.
> >
> >
> > I am writing this email since i recently found FFmepg remove DNN native
> backend, and i will be really grateful if you let me know if there is any new
> plan on libavfilter/dnn.
> >
> >
> > I would like to explain to you again about the addition of dnn paddle
> backend.
> >
> > At present, ffmpeg only supports openvino and tensorflow backend.
> Among the current deep learning frameworks, TensorFlow is the most active
> in development. TensorFlow has 174k stars and pytorch has 66.5k. openvino
> is 4.2k, and the models that openvino can implement are relatively few. But
> in terms of attention on GitHub, there's no doubt that TensorFlow and
> pytorch are more promising. Currently, the paddle framework has reached
> 20.2k stars on github, which is much more widely used and active than
> frameworks such as mxnet and caffe.
>
> Stars don't matter much here.
>
> Just for reference, there is a thread before:
>
> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20220523092918.9548-
> 2-ting.fu at intel.com/
>
> >
> > Tensoflow has a very rich ecosystem. The TensorFlow models library
> updates very quickly and has existing examples of deep learning applications
> for image classification, object detection, image generation text, and
> generation of adversus-network models. The dnn libavfilter module is
> undoubtedly very necessary for tensorflow backend to support. But the
> complexity of the TensorFlow API and the complexity of the training are
> almost prohibitive, making it a love-hate framework.
> >
> > PyTorch framework tends to be applied to academic fast implementation,
> and its industrial application performance is not good. For example, Pytorch
> framework makes a model to run on a server, Android phone or embedded
> system, and its performance is poor compared with other deep learning
> frameworks.
> >
> >
> > PaddlePadddle is an open source framework of Baidu, which is also used
> by many people in China. It is very consistent with the usage habits of
> developers, but the practicability of the API still needs to be further
> strengthened. However, Paddle is the only deep learning framework I have
> ever used, which does not configure any third-party libraries and can be
> used directly by cloning make. Besides, Paddle occupies a small amount of
> memory and is fast. It also serves a considerable number of projects inside
> Baidu, which is very strong in industrial application. And PaddlePaddle
> supports multiple machine and multiple card training.
Imo, my idea is that we can add 1 or 2 dnn backends as discussed at
http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-December/304534.html
The background is that we see different good models from different deep learning
frameworks, and most framework does not support models developed with other
frameworks due to different model format. imo, we'd support several popular frameworks.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list