[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 08/10] swscale/swscale_unscaled: Fix odd height with nv24_to_yuv420p_chroma()
Ramiro Polla
ramiro.polla at gmail.com
Mon Dec 2 15:45:34 EET 2024
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 1:33 AM Michael Niedermayer
<michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:01:33AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 03:16:30PM +0200, Ramiro Polla wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 3:35 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > > <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:42:22AM +0200, Ramiro Polla wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:04 AM Michael Niedermayer
> > > > > <michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: out of array read
> > > > > > Fixes: 71726/clusterfuzz-testcase-ffmpeg_SWS_fuzzer-5876893532880896
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 2 ++
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c b/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c
> > > > > > index dc1d5f35932..d403c953cc7 100644
> > > > > > --- a/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c
> > > > > > +++ b/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c
> > > > > > @@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ static void nv24_to_yuv420p_chroma(uint8_t *dst1, int dstStride1,
> > > > > > const uint8_t *src2 = src + srcStride;
> > > > > > // average 4 pixels into 1 (interleaved U and V)
> > > > > > for (int y = 0; y < h; y += 2) {
> > > > > > + if (y + 1 == h)
> > > > > > + src2 = src1;
> > > > > > for (int x = 0; x < w; x++) {
> > > > > > dst1[x] = (src1[4 * x + 0] + src1[4 * x + 2] +
> > > > > > src2[4 * x + 0] + src2[4 * x + 2]) >> 2;
> > > > >
> > > > > I would prefer to keep nv24_to_yuv420p_chroma() expecting height to be
> > > > > a multiple of 2. We could add && !(c->srcH & 1) before selecting
> > > > > nv24ToYuv420Wrapper.
> > > >
> > > > what advantage does this have ?
> > >
> > > This would also have the benefit of keeping the function clearer, and
> > > we wouldn't have to add special cases that might or might not be ok.
> >
> > > It would also make it easier to write simd code, since we wouldn't
> > > have to worry about these special cases.
> >
> > The SIMD code could support a subset of the c code
> >
> >
> > >
> > > It is also easy to forget these corner cases, which leads to some
> > > converters behaving differently in corner cases. For example, the
> > > current yuyv422 to yuv420p scaler just doesn't output the last line if
> > > it has an odd height. What is the correct fix? Should we convert the
> > > last line differently like in this case? Should we duplicate the
> > > second-to-last line? Should we just add a couple lines of code to
> > > tweak the converter? Should we instead call this function with an even
> > > height, and call another function for the last line?
> >
> > >
> > > IMO a converter to yuv420p with odd width or height shouldn't be an
> > > unscaled converter, since we're effectively scaling the chroma planes
> > > (and not just by a factor of two). In this case, the regular scaler
> > > would be used.
> >
> > Iam not sure i understand correctly, but
> > assuming a 99 lines 4:4:4 scaled to 99 lines 4:2:0
> > the chroma here is not a simple "99 to 50 lines rescaling"
> > the chroma samples must stay co-located in relation to the luma samples
> > that can only happen with s 2:1 not a 99:50 rescaling
> > but maybe i misunderstood what you meant
>
> The fuzzer found another sample for this issue:
> 377735917/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_SWS_fuzzer-6686071112400896
>
> I still think my patch is fine, if someone else wants to disable the code
> from being used for odd sizes thats not breaking the code, it just would
> then not be used in some cases it could be used for.
>
> If you prefer to only disable this for odd cases, please disable it.
> I just want the bug fixed and not left open
I planned on going over the unscaled subsampled conversion functions
and making sure they all work with odd widths and heights in a
consistent way, but I haven't gotten around to it, and I don't think
I'll have time in the near future.
So I guess for now this patch is ok.
Thanks,
Ramiro
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list