[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] avcodec/cuvid: introduce a ringbuffer to reattach additional data

[Clément Péron]

Hi Hendrik,

On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 17:47, Devin Heitmueller
<devin.heitmueller at ltnglobal.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 9:57 AM Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The real question is, why are you using cuviddec instead of nvdec?
> > side data would already pass through natively with nvdec, and other
> > hwaccel-based decoders.

I think it's a good question and I will try to benchmark performance
and latency of the nvdec against cuvid for my use case.

Are you sure that side data would be natively supported with nvdec?

Reading the source code, the only function I saw is
ff_decode_frame_props(), which will make the side data not properly
sync for my use case.
>
> I suspect there could be benefits if your workload involves alot of
> decoding and the GPU only has a single nvdec unit on it.  Even if it's
> less efficient to do it with CUDA, getting a graphics card with lots
> of CUDA units could very well be cheaper than a card with multiple
> nvdec fixed units on it (each of which might only be able to do 10-15
> decodes depending on codec/resolution/framerate).
>
> Devin
>
> --
> Devin Heitmueller, Senior Software Engineer
> LTN Global Communications
> o: +1 (301) 363-1001
> w: https://ltnglobal.com  e: devin.heitmueller at ltnglobal.com
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".