[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: complete rework of s337m support

[Rémi Denis-Courmont]

Le 13 décembre 2024 12:14:43 GMT+02:00, Nicolas George <george at nsup.org> a écrit :
>Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (12024-12-13):
>> Then the conclusion in your example is wrong.
>
>No it is not. Either you misunderstood what I explained

Rather what you wrote ("wave") is not what you meant, presumably "PCM". As You Know, in a multimedia technical discussion, anyone would take "wave" to refer to the Microsoft RIFF waveform file format, not a naked wave form. Misspeaking is not quite the same as being misunderstood.

> I am guessing you only read it superficially,
> you did not actually try to do it for
>yourself 

I don't know what to make of that sentence, to be honest. Are you implying that you deliberately used confusing ambiguous terminology? What would even be the point of doing such a thing?!

> — or you really do not know how to use ffmpeg.

Now you're just being provocative. Would it kill you to admit that your answer was poorly written?

Anyway, that doesn't advance the technical original controversy in this thread, so I'll leave it at that.