[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule

Ronald S. Bultje rsbultje at gmail.com
Mon Feb 26 20:12:45 EET 2024


Hi,

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:34 AM Anton Khirnov <anton at khirnov.net> wrote:

> Quoting Ronald S. Bultje (2024-02-23 20:36:11)
> > Hi Nicolas
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:56 AM Nicolas George <george at nsup.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Anton Khirnov (12024-02-22):
> > > > In my updated proposal, based on comments by Niklas and Rémi, I'm
> > > > leaving it up to the TC member in question, based on the assumption
> that
> > > > TC members are honest.
> > > >
> > > > A "stronger" version could conceivably leave it to CC to decide
> > > > ambiguous cases. Feel free to propose such a version if you prefer
> it.
> > >
> > > Your version does nothing to address the issue of the current
> situation,
> > > where the contributor who has to raise an issue in front of the TC does
> > > not trust one member of the TC to be unbiased on this issue.
> > >
> > > I therefore maintain my alternate proposition as is.
> > >
> >
> > I think you and Anton are trying to fix different issues. I would propose
> > to run independent votes over Anton's proposal and your proposal, in no
> > particular order.
>
> I would propose people stop proposing fundamental changes to other
> people's proposals and propose something of their own instead, if they
> care. Otherwise we'll never get anywhere.
>

That's essentially what I was suggesting: run a GA vote on your proposed
amendment, and then run a separate GA vote on Nicolas' proposed amendment.

Ronald


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list