[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/filter: fix typos in introduction with the word 'unlabelled'

[Marth64]

Kindly disregard. This is not actually a typo, it is valid regional
English. Sorry. Just ignore this one.

On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 4:51 PM Marth64 <marth64 at proxyid.net> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Marth64 <marth64 at proxyid.net>
> ---
>  doc/filters.texi | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi
> index f4084ff494..eff2256fef 100644
> --- a/doc/filters.texi
> +++ b/doc/filters.texi
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ filtergraph, a link between the corresponding input
> and output pad is
>  created.
>
>  If an output pad is not labelled, it is linked by default to the first
> -unlabelled input pad of the next filter in the filterchain.
> +unlabeled input pad of the next filter in the filterchain.
>  For example in the filterchain
>  @example
>  nullsrc, split[L1], [L2]overlay, nullsink
> @@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ the split filter instance has two output pads, and
> the overlay filter
>  instance two input pads. The first output pad of split is labelled
>  "L1", the first input pad of overlay is labelled "L2", and the second
>  output pad of split is linked to the second input pad of overlay,
> -which are both unlabelled.
> +which are both unlabeled.
>
>  In a filter description, if the input label of the first filter is not
>  specified, "in" is assumed; if the output label of the last filter is not
>  specified, "out" is assumed.
>
> -In a complete filterchain all the unlabelled filter input and output
> +In a complete filterchain all the unlabeled filter input and output
>  pads must be connected. A filtergraph is considered valid if all the
>  filter input and output pads of all the filterchains are connected.
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>