[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] doc/community: Conflict of interest recusal requirement (Similar to mid part of Antons proposal)
Vittorio Giovara
vittorio.giovara at gmail.com
Mon Mar 4 11:42:02 EET 2024
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 1:46 AM Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
wrote:
> > Again, the effective way to work-around this problem is to keep a large
> and
> > diverse enough TC membership to offset the one or few hypothetical
> dishonest
> > votes.
>
> This doesnt work. The set of people is very specific, and they will always
> be
> representatives of the community so when 60% of the community works for
> companies which would benefit by FFmpeg not competing. There
> would be no realistic way to have a committee that wasnt also 60% affected
> by this. And for this we need a clear rule.
>
This scenario is, also, not realistic.
--
Vittorio
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list