[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] avcodec/dovi_rpu: implement support for profile 10

[Niklas Haas]

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 12:44:49 +0100 Niklas Haas <ffmpeg at haasn.xyz> wrote:
> From: Niklas Haas <git at haasn.dev>
> 
> Instead of the nal_prefix, this profile inside wraps the RPU inside an
> EMDF header, as specified in ETSI TS 102 366. This particular usage is
> supposedly specified in ETSI TS 103 572, at least according to European
> Patent EP 3 588 964 A1, but I could not find any references to DV RPUs
> in the former.
> 
> It's worth pointing out that the EMDF container is not byte-aligned,
> meaning that payloads are delivered at arbitrary byte boundaries. Hence
> the reason for doing it inside ff_dovi_rpu_parse, which already uses
> a bitstream reader, rather than splitting off the container in
> a separate stage. (Plus, we hard-code the DV-specific payload ID)
> 
> Magic values were taken from a combination of the sources below, all of
> which agree about what the specific EMDF header should look like. In
> fact, they all hard-code a very *specific* header sequence, but I wanted
> to go the extra mile and at least properly skip the variable fields
> - even though the non-existent Dolby Vision specification probably
> specifies that they all must be 0. This is probably overkill.
> 
> Validated and tested using sample files from the merge request linked
> below.
> 
> Relevant links:
> - https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102300_102399/102366/01.04.01_60/ts_102366v010401p.pdf
> - https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/8a/0b/da/28294acaed2182/EP3588964A1.pdf
> - https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103500_103599/103572/01.03.01_60/ts_103572v010301p.pdf
> - https://github.com/rockchip-linux/mpp/blob/fdeb8c378b79d4b4ef80457e4431815de89dc417/mpp/codec/dec/av1/av1d_cbs.c#L2378
> - https://github.com/elginsk8r/android_kernel_amlogic_linux-4.9/blob/23a4c38bf06ef34821e476a8edddbf9213712c8a/drivers/amlogic/media/enhancement/amdolby_vision/amdolby_vision.c#L5638
> - https://gitlab.com/mbunkus/mkvtoolnix/-/merge_requests/2254

Ping. Is there anybody who could kindly review this?