[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavc: replace ff_thread_get_buffer() with ff_get_buffer()

[Paul B Mahol]

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:21 PM Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:10 PM Sean McGovern <gseanmcg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 08:20 Nicolas George <george at nsup.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Andreas Rheinhardt (12024-03-08):
> > > > What maintenance cost and complexity are you referring to? I checked
> > and
> > > > could not find a single commit where one had to fix an
> ff_get_buffer()
> > > > to ff_thread_get_buffer() because it has been forgotten when the
> > decoder
> > > > has been declared to support frame threading.
> > >
> > > Welcome to the new FFmpeg, where absolute consistency, i.e. catering
> for
> > > hypothetical mediocre contributors, is more important than easy
> > > optimizations and new approaches.
> > >
> > > And if you do not like it, “shut up, I'm on the TC and I won't recuse”.
> > >
> > > And if you do not like that, “shut up, I'm on the CC too”.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > >   Nicolas George
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > > ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> > > ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> > >
> >
> > Everybody can we *please* keep the responses civil/professional on the
> ML.
> >
>
> I'd just be happy with "on-topic" but it seems like people with agendas
> like to project on unrelated threads.
>

LibAV actions speak more than words once again.


> --
> Vittorio
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>