[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule

[Anton Khirnov]

Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-03-24 03:21:50)
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 01:52:55PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Michael,
> 
> > following up on the previous discussion in this thread - if you,
> > personally, would like to vote for a different option than those
> > suggested so far, please propose one.
> 
> The goal of the vote is to find the option which most people prefer.
> Not the option that I personally prefer.

My point is that you should suggest options that you personally prefer,
not invent options for some imaginary people who cannot speak for
themselves. There is no evidence of them existing.

> You also added 3 options yourself, which i presume you dont all
> intend to vote for yourself

Keeping the line without change and deleting it entirely seem like
obvious "null" choices to me, but I can remove them if you prefer.

> Simply omiting opposing options is not how Democracy works

You're misrepresenting my point. It's not about "opposing" options, I
have no issue with adding those suggested by Nicolas or Gyan. I have an
issue with options that nobody actually wants.

> You could discuss with others and try to find a smaller set of options
> that still represent all cases the team may want.

The discussion already happened. We have all the options that actual
people have actually wanted. So kindly stop this obstructionism.

-- 
Anton Khirnov