[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libpostproc splitout
Michael Niedermayer
michael at niedermayer.cc
Thu Nov 7 22:44:03 EET 2024
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 12:11:49AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Should libpostproc be split out into a seperate source repository ?
>
> Several people did over the years want libpostproc removed, and such
> a task was part of the submitted and approved STF 2024 projects.
> But when i recently started posting related work, tomas questioned
> if spliting libpostproc into a seperate source repository actually is a good idea.
>
> No invoice was submitted yet, so we could likely still change
> this to something else, if thats what people prefer.
>
> To clarify this a bit (as its a bit convoluted)
> Option A.
> 1. split libpostproc out so it builds and links fine (already done) (send to SPI/STF/Invoice in future)
> 2. develop test system for libpostproc (2024 future) (send to SPI/STF/Invoice in future)
> 3. actually remove libpostproc from master repository (2025 future) (send to SPI/STF/Invoice in future)
to clarify this, because i guess one can misunderstand this.
libpostproc at this would be maintained in a seperate source repository and
FFmpeg will of course continue to support linking and using that external libpostproc
I do intend to maintain libpostproc, and would certainly be happy about every
contribution. (A new API would be needed so a wider range of libavfilter features
are available in libpostproc)
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The real ebay dictionary, page 2
"100% positive feedback" - "All either got their money back or didnt complain"
"Best seller ever, very honest" - "Seller refunded buyer after failed scam"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20241107/061841e0/attachment.sig>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list