[FFmpeg-devel] [REQUEST] Remove me from GA
Rémi Denis-Courmont
remi at remlab.net
Wed Nov 20 22:59:32 EET 2024
Le keskiviikkona 20. marraskuuta 2024, 22.39.59 EET compn a écrit :
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:39:49 -0500
>
> Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara at gmail.com> wrote:
> >I care about the process for using the ffmpeg name at a public event.
>
> wouldnt any question of commercial use of the ffmpeg trademarked name
> have to go through fabrice ?
>
> i'm seriously asking, i dont know.
That depends in which countries he holds the trademark, for what purpose and
is the trademark is not somehow considered undefended. To my knowledge, as far
as NAB is concerned, he does not own any applicable trademark that would be
valid in Clark County. So from a legal standpoint, I think that anybody can do
whatever the hell they want with the FFmpeg name and logo there.
That being said, I do think that the moral question remains regarding what is
right or wrong to do with them, and nothing prevents the GA from setting rules
on, say, their members or FFmpeg-devel subscribers. In other words, it does
not feel right that one person unilaterally claims to represent FFmpeg, even
if it may be legal.
IMO, if someone intends to represent FFmpeg at an event, it is minimum
courtesy to notify FFmpeg-devel *before* the arrangements are made. Then
whoever arranges the booth should do best efforts to have it staffed. (FWIW, the
IBC booth was _empty_ except for a logo.) And finally, the booth should not be
let hijacked by another entity (this includes a GPAC-related for-profit).
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list