[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libpostproc splitout

[epirat07 at gmail.com]

On 22 Nov 2024, at 13:38, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:

> I do not accept this warning, and I do not agree with your reasoning.
>
> The entire point of that thread was paid work, and cost matters. I worded
> in an entirelty legitimate way.
>
> The fact that all the BS that has happened on this list since and *this*
> is the result is, for lack of a better work, complete bullshit.
>
> The CC is a lame duck.
>
> - Derek
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libpostproc splitout
> Date: 	Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:18:04 -0500
> From: 	Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>
> To: 	Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com>
> CC: 	cc at ffmpeg.org
>
>
>
> Hi Derek,
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 11:04 AM Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com <mailto:derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     This work was very easy and not worth even remotely close to 5K euro.
>
>
> This comment ("This work is not worth XYZ") was unnecessarily provocative. Please consider stating something as subjective as this as an opinion instead of an assertion - like you did further on in this thread.
>
> Thank you,
> the CC [Steven, James, JB, Ronald - with Michael abstaining & not participating]

While I might not in principle disagree with the CCs action here, the (at least perceived) inaction of the CC
in other cases makes this seem the CC has a huge double standard how to deal with things…
(Or there is a big communication/transparency problem.)

> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".