[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] ogg/vorbis: implement header packet skip in chained ogg bitstreams.

[Michael Niedermayer]

Hi

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 04:12:13PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le dim. 27 juil. 2025 à 19:22, Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi Romain
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 02:06:07PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > Le sam. 21 juin 2025 à 16:59, Michael Niedermayer <
> michael at niedermayer.cc>
> > > a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > > > Le dim. 15 juin 2025 à 00:57, Michael Niedermayer
> > > > > <michael at niedermayer.cc> a écrit :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:58:52AM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > > > > > This is a redo of 574f634e49847e2225ee50013afebf0de03ef013
> using a
> > > flat
> > > > > > > memory storage for the extradata.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PR review comments addressed:
> > > > > > > * Use flat memory bytestream
> > > > > > > * Re-use existing xiph extradata layout
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >  libavcodec/vorbisdec.c                     | 42 ++++++++---
> > > > > > >  libavformat/oggparsevorbis.c               | 83
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > >
> > > > > > patches that change both libraries at the same time are suspect
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if one depends on changes in the other it needs
> > > > > > minor API version bump and seperate patches so extension of
> > > > > > API and use of it are properly tracked and testable
> > > > >
> > > > > If I remember well, according to Andreas Rheinhardt there's no need
> > > > > for an API bump here since the patch is re-using existing extradata
> > > > > bitstream structures.
> > > >
> > > > If there is really no API extension then the micro versions should be
> > > bumped
> > > > so a user knows if the specific version he uses has teh fix.
> > > > Also it may be usefull in bugreports about ogg to know if its prior or
> > > > after this change
> > >
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > I have created a PR on code.ffmpeg.org here:
> > > https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20026
> > >
> >
> > > Would you have a minute to have a look?
> >
> > I do not have time, ive made a dumb mistake in configuring my inbox
> > so iam about a week behind with emails without realizing it.
> > thats on top of release, security, and other things
> >
> > maybe someome else can look into this one
> > replying here so noone waits for a review from me
> 
> Thanks for letting me know and sorry about your issues with your email
> inbox.
> 
> Do you have any advice on how to look for a reviewer for this path?

social media, like twitter

also if it has a positive vibe then we can retweet

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being
governed by those who are dumber. -- Plato 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20250803/ecc9efbe/attachment.sig>