[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fftools: notify user of flags upon loglevel parse failure

Gyan Doshi ffmpeg at gyani.pro
Sun Feb 23 09:36:28 EET 2025



On 2025-02-21 05:34 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2025-02-21 04:34 pm, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> Gyan Doshi:
>>>
>>> On 2025-02-21 02:21 pm, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>>>> Gyan Doshi:
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    fftools/opt_common.c | 5 +++++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fftools/opt_common.c b/fftools/opt_common.c
>>>>> index 317e8458c1..2ac3fd4fb3 100644
>>>>> --- a/fftools/opt_common.c
>>>>> +++ b/fftools/opt_common.c
>>>>> @@ -1330,6 +1330,11 @@ int opt_loglevel(void *optctx, const char
>>>>> *opt, const char *arg)
>>>>>                   "Possible levels are numbers or:\n", arg);
>>>>>            for (i = 0; i < FF_ARRAY_ELEMS(log_levels); i++)
>>>>>                av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_FATAL, "\"%s\"\n",
>>>>> log_levels[i].name);
>>>>> +        av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_FATAL, "Possible flags are:\n");
>>>>> +        av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_FATAL, "\"repeat\"\n");
>>>>> +        av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_FATAL, "\"level\"\n");
>>>>> +        av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_FATAL, "\"time\"\n");
>>>>> +        av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_FATAL, "\"datetime\"\n");
>>>>>            return AVERROR(EINVAL);
>>>>>        }
>>>> This would all fit into one line.
>>> Do you mean a single log call, or also printed on one line?
>>> If the former, the remaining values will be misaligned with the 
>>> first one.
>>> If the latter, it's prettier with one value per line, just like the log
>>> level values printed just above.
>> I meant the latter. And I actually prefer the more compact form
>> "repeat", "level", "time", "datetime" to the one-value-per-line form.
>
> I think the per-line approach is visually clearer, so I'd like to keep 
> it as it is. You can submit a patch to reformat it if you like.

Plan to push tomorrow.

Regards,
Gyan



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list