[FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

[Soft Works]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Soft Works
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 6:23 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> > Marth64
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 6:15 PM
> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> > devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization
> >
> > Hi Soft Works,
> >
> > > What do you mean by "colorful language"?
> > > And "mockery" - you mean the pseudo code? What's wrong about
> that?
> > I could have said the same in many words as well.
> > Words are fine and passionate opinions are fine. The pseudocode and
> > "shit-storming" comment came off the wrong way, that's all.
> 
> The same aggressive accusations and threats by the same person sent
> for 4th time.
> 
> I'm afraid, but this _is_ SHIT-STORMING and I just named what it is.
> 

It took me 20 minutes to even get the point. I have seen respectable persons, even a school teacher (albeit German) saying "shitstorm". I was and still am considering it as a technical term, expressing exactly and only for what it's commonly used.
You will never see me writing the first part word or any other kinds of swear words, for which I think there must be no room on this ML or any other public discussion.

So I apologize for the misunderstanding. I didn't intend to be rude or hurt anybody's feelings, I just meant to express for what it's commonly used and didn't mean to take the conversation some levels downwards.

sw