[FFmpeg-devel] [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org

[Michael Niedermayer]

Hi all

On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Do people want Forgejo or Gitlab on code.ffmpeg.org for testing?
> 
> F. code.ffmpeg.org should run Forgejo
> G. code.ffmpeg.org should run Gitlab
> 
> all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a
> "F." / "Forgejo" vs "G." / "Gitlab"
> End time is in 7 days unless teh community wants to extend that.
> (or do people want a formal vote to be setup? on vote.ffmpeg.org)

7 day period passed,

Quick count says:
Gitlab :  3 Votes
Forgejo: 12 Votes


> 
> After we decide what to run on code.ffmpeg.org, I intend to
> * apply the CI patches which timo currently keeps rebasing on the Forgejo git
>   (maybe timo can post these to ffmpeg-devel)

timo, ping can you post the patches ?


> 
> * extend my github cronjob to autosync Forgejo or Gitlab too
>   (or someone else can set one up)

anyone wants to set this up ?


> 
> * announce code.ffmpeg.org publically so people can start submitting
>   and reviewing on it as an alternative to the ML

suggestions for news (patch) and twitter announcement welcome!

thx

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20250721/797e3ba4/attachment.sig>