[FFmpeg-devel] [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 03:03:08AM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> On 7/21/2025 2:54 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> > 
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > > 
> > > Do people want Forgejo or Gitlab on code.ffmpeg.org for testing?
> > > 
> > > F. code.ffmpeg.org should run Forgejo
> > > G. code.ffmpeg.org should run Gitlab
> > > 
> > > all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a
> > > "F." / "Forgejo" vs "G." / "Gitlab"
> > > End time is in 7 days unless teh community wants to extend that.
> > > (or do people want a formal vote to be setup? on vote.ffmpeg.org)
> > 
> > 7 day period passed,
> > 
> > Quick count says:
> > Gitlab :  3 Votes
> > Forgejo: 12 Votes
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > After we decide what to run on code.ffmpeg.org, I intend to
> > > * apply the CI patches which timo currently keeps rebasing on the Forgejo git
> > >    (maybe timo can post these to ffmpeg-devel)
> > 
> > timo, ping can you post the patches ?
> 
> I'll rebase them into one patch and post them.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > * extend my github cronjob to autosync Forgejo or Gitlab too
> > >    (or someone else can set one up)
> > 
> > anyone wants to set this up ?
> 
> I can add forgejo to my sync cronjobs, yeah.

please do

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

For a strong democracy, genuine criticism is necessary, allegations benefit
noone, they just cause unnecessary conflicts. - Narendra Modi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20250721/1f96dc34/attachment.sig>