[FFmpeg-devel] The "bad" Patch
softworkz .
softworkz at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 2 12:31:00 EEST 2025
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Nicolas
> George
> Sent: Montag, 2. Juni 2025 09:58
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] The "bad" Patch
>
> Michael Niedermayer (HE12025-06-02):
> > Id like you to be in the next community committee. (together with marth64)
>
> Sorry, but Are you out of your mind?
>
> > Because it seems you seriously care about stoping defamations and the
> > general sozial backstabbing that has appeared in the recent decade
>
> “Seems” is the important word here.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas George
> _______________________________________________
Yes, the "seems" is accurate in your perception - but you are also
the only one with that perception.
This is because you are the one (and only one) for whom I make an
exception. All rules are lifted, so that I can adequately respond
to your inevitable, sometimes more and sometimes less hidden insults.
This means that you are the only person here which I'm deliberately
and intentionally insulting. It's a quid-pro-quo, and I think
we're even in this regard.
But there's an important distinction: It's always that you serve
and I return. It never originates from my side.
If you write friendly, I return friendly, but as you are unable to
write even three consecutive sentences which are sincerely friendly
and without any half-hidden, disguised, alluded or implied indirect
or direct insults, you just never get to see a friendly response
from me.
Sometimes it makes fun to respond to your disgusting scribblings
with a text that you deserve.
But overall, I would much prefer when you would write, without
all those despicable side lines - simple and friendly like a
normal person would do.
Best regards
sw
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list