[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] checkasm: h264dsp: test luma_dc_dequant

[Tristan Matthews]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 4:14 PM Martin Storsjö <martin at martin.st> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2025, Tristan Matthews wrote:
>
> > ---
> > tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c b/tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c
> > index d1228ed985..5fba31cf69 100644
> > --- a/tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c
> > +++ b/tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > #include "checkasm.h"
> > #include "libavcodec/h264dsp.h"
> > #include "libavcodec/h264data.h"
> > +#include "libavcodec/h264idct.h"
> > #include "libavcodec/h264_parse.h"
> > #include "libavutil/common.h"
> > #include "libavutil/intreadwrite.h"
> > @@ -324,6 +325,41 @@ static void check_idct_multiple(void)
> >     }
> > }
> >
> > +static void check_idct_dequant(void)
> > +{
> > +    static const int depths[5] = { 8, 9, 10, 12, 14 };
> > +    LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(int16_t, src, [16]);
> > +    LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(int16_t, dst0, [16 * 16]);
> > +    LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(int16_t, dst1, [16 * 16]);
> > +    H264DSPContext h;
> > +    int bit_depth, i, qmul;
> > +    declare_func_emms(AV_CPU_FLAG_MMX | AV_CPU_FLAG_SSE2, void, int16_t *output, int16_t *input, int qmul);
> > +
> > +    for (int j = 0; j < 16; j++)
> > +        src[j] = (rnd() % 512) - 256;
> > +
> > +    qmul = rnd() % 4096;
> > +
> > +    memset(dst0, 0, 16 * 16 * sizeof(dst0[0]));
> > +    memset(dst1, 0, 16 * 16 * sizeof(dst1[0]));
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; i < FF_ARRAY_ELEMS(depths); i++) {
> > +        bit_depth = depths[i];
> > +        ff_h264dsp_init(&h, bit_depth, 1);
> > +
> > +        if (check_func(h.h264_luma_dc_dequant_idct, "h264_luma_dc_dequant_idct_%d", bit_depth)) {
> > +
> > +            call_ref(dst0, src, qmul);
> > +            call_new(dst1, src, qmul);
> > +
> > +            if (memcmp(dst0, dst1, 16 * 16 * sizeof(*dst0)))
> > +                fail();
>
> If possible, use the checkasm_check_*() helpers for validation for new
> code; this gives you printout of the differing values if you run "checkasm
> -v" and more. In this case, I think checkasm_check(int16_t, dst0,
> 16*sizeof(int16_t), dst1, 16*sizeof(int16_t), 16, 16, "dst") would be
> suitable one.

Good catch, also I realized that the output buffers were too small,
will be fixed in the next version.