[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] statictrac, trac and caching

Michael Niedermayer michael at niedermayer.cc
Sun Jun 15 22:05:41 EEST 2025


Hi Kacper

On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 05:57:09PM +0200, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
[...]

> Maybe it's time to retire the trac? It is quite slow by design and not
> really actively maintained anymore. Holding onto legacy software
> always increases the burden of maintainability.

While performance is just one metric, and i dont think its a good reason
to switch because of that.

Lets look at the numbers anyway, we had an average of about 1 million accesses
from the set of /24 IP ranges posted over the course of one day.
thats like 10 accesses per second _average_ over 24h

asking chatgpt, what the performance of various bug trackers are
on a single server. There is only a single one that chatgpt listed
can do 1+ million, that is Forgejo (with issues module)

now granted thats just an LLMs awnser but it doesnt give me confidence
that switching the tracker will solve this

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The real ebay dictionary, page 2
"100% positive feedback" - "All either got their money back or didnt complain"
"Best seller ever, very honest" - "Seller refunded buyer after failed scam"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20250615/8783d7e5/attachment.sig>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list