[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] checkasm/h264dsp: Fix stack overflow in check_idct_dequant
Zhao Zhili
quinkblack at foxmail.com
Mon Jun 16 11:18:55 EEST 2025
> On Jun 16, 2025, at 15:16, Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Zhao Zhili:
>> From: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao at tencent.com>
>>
>> ---
>> tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c b/tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c
>> index f5f9650224..006532e08b 100644
>> --- a/tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c
>> +++ b/tests/checkasm/h264dsp.c
>> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static void check_idct_multiple(void)
>> static void check_idct_dequant(void)
>> {
>> static const int depths[5] = { 8, 9, 10, 12, 14 };
>> - LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(int16_t, src, [16]);
>> + LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(int16_t, src, [16 * 2]);
>> /* Ensure dst buffers are large enough to hold dctcoefs of all bit-depths. */
>> LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(uint8_t, dst0, [16 * 16 * sizeof(int32_t)]);
>> LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(uint8_t, dst1, [16 * 16 * sizeof(int32_t)]);
>> @@ -338,15 +338,21 @@ static void check_idct_dequant(void)
>> int bit_depth, i, qmul;
>> declare_func_emms(AV_CPU_FLAG_MMX | AV_CPU_FLAG_SSE2, void, int16_t *output, int16_t *input, int qmul);
>>
>> - for (int j = 0; j < 16; j++)
>> - src[j] = (rnd() % 512) - 256;
>> -
>> qmul = rnd() % 4096;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < FF_ARRAY_ELEMS(depths); i++) {
>> bit_depth = depths[i];
>> ff_h264dsp_init(&h, bit_depth, 1);
>>
>> + if (bit_depth == 8) {
>> + for (int j = 0; j < 16; j++)
>> + src[j] = (rnd() % 512) - 256;
>> + } else {
>> + int32_t *p = (int32_t *)src;
>> + for (int j = 0; j < 16; j++)
>> + p[j] = (rnd() % (1 << (bit_depth + 1))) - (1 << bit_depth);
>
> This is an effective type violation and therefore UB.
Yes. And the template functions are UB.
> Furthermore,
> increasing the size of the array has the downside that stack overflows
> in the 8 bit codepath may go undetected. So better add a
> LOCAL_ALIGNED_16(int32_t, src32, [16]) and use that for the >8 bit tests.
I think this is still UB by pass it as argument to h264_luma_dc_dequant_idct,
due to the function prototype.
I have no idea other than union or separate test case.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> memset(dst0, 0, 16 * 16 * SIZEOF_COEF);
>> memset(dst1, 0, 16 * 16 * SIZEOF_COEF);
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list