[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: Fix typos
softworkz
ffmpegagent at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 09:46:49 EEST 2025
From: softworkz <softworkz at hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: softworkz <softworkz at hotmail.com>
---
doc/developer: Fix typos
Published-As: https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg/releases/tag/pr-ffstaging-103%2Fsoftworkz%2Fsubmit_typos-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg pr-ffstaging-103/softworkz/submit_typos-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/ffstaging/FFmpeg/pull/103
doc/developer.texi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
index 108558b9e0..f4ae300c2b 100644
--- a/doc/developer.texi
+++ b/doc/developer.texi
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ paste it from a random place, use an existing file as template.
@subheading You must not commit code which breaks FFmpeg!
This means unfinished code which is enabled and breaks compilation,
or compiles but does not work/breaks the regression tests. Code which
-is unfinished but disabled may be permitted under-circumstances, like
+is unfinished but disabled may be permitted under circumstances, like
missing samples or an implementation with a small subset of features.
Always check the mailing list for any reviewers with issues and test
FATE before you push.
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ FFmpeg also has a defined scope - your new API must fit within it.
@subsubheading Replacing existing APIs
If your new API is replacing an existing one, it should be strictly superior to
-it, so that the advantages of using the new API outweight the cost to the
+it, so that the advantages of using the new API outweigh the cost to the
callers of changing their code. After adding the new API you should then
deprecate the old one and schedule it for removal, as described in
@ref{Removing interfaces}.
base-commit: 0ffe97d9b9e10e88db29d8d910c24ec00ef24edc
--
ffmpeg-codebot
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list