[FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview

[softworkz .]

> > From: Kieran Kunhya <kieran618 at googlemail.com> 
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 16:07
> > To: softworkz . <softworkz at hotmail.com>
> > Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 22 May 2025, 15:03 softworkz ., <mailto:softworkz at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ffmpeg-devel <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Kieran
> > > Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> > > Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2025 14:46
> > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <mailto:ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> > > Cc: Kieran Kunhya <mailto:kieran618 at googlemail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview
> > > 
> > > > I really wonder how Kieran can't be embarrassed trying such maneuvers which
> > > > are so obvious to everybody.
> > > 
> > > I really wonder how you can't be embarrassed sending what imo is the
> > > worst patchset in the history of the project.
> > > Instead of acknowledging that, it's deflecting and playing the victim
> > > you want to do.
> > > 
> > > Kieran
> > > _______________________________________________
> > 
> > I like that! Keep going. Was that all you got?
> > 
> > sw
> 
> A patchset so bad, people who quit the project like Derek came back to clean up your mess.
> 
> Kieran 
> 
> people who quit the project like Derek came back

That'd be too much of an honour - but really, it doesn't work like that. 
You need to keep focusing on saying bad and defaming things.

Try again, I'm sure you can do better...

sw