[FFmpeg-user] ? About ffmpeg's prores implemention

[Edward Park]

Hi,

>> I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about??
> 
> Closely read your text that you removed out.

You're reading into it too much if it provoked fear or uncertainty in your mind, wasn't my intention.

>> What is, AME or one of the prores encoders included in FFmpeg? I mean
>> obviously it'd depend on the job and hardware but for what it's worth I
>> compared prores_ks with 4444xq and it took around twice the wallclock time.
>> It did indeed take way more than twice the cpu time though, but if its
>> output has problems then the whole point is moot :/
> 
> Your comparison is not scientifically proven and thus is highly
> personally biased.

Yes it was an observation of a single test case. I did say it was pointless. And I think being biased towards fairness is something to be avoided, at least personally, that is.

Regards,
Ted Park