[FFmpeg-user] Yes or No? About the processing pipeline.

Carl Zwanzig cpz at tuunq.com
Tue Jun 17 20:56:14 EEST 2025


On 6/17/2025 10:31 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
> On 17/06/2025 13.27, Carl Zwanzig wrote:

>> Consider "Quod Gratis Asseritur, Gratis Negatur"* (or "What is 
>> asserted without proof can be denied without proof.") It's your 
>> assertion that "It would make sense to automatically decode to 16-bit 
>> rgb444." You get to defend that.
> 
> I made no such assertion.

You did, and wrote it again-

> I wrote: "It would make sense to automatically decode to 16-bit rgb444." 
> Yes or No?

If you had written "Would it make sense...", which forms a question, it 
could be answered as a question; saying "It would make sense...." is an 
assertion which must be defended against other peoples' questions. So 
which is it, a question or an assertion?


On 6/17/2025 10:42 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
 > On 17/06/2025 13.38, BloodMan wrote:
 >> W dniu 2025-06-17 o 19:01, Mark Filipak pisze:
 >>  > That was not a 'Yes' or 'No' response.
 >> there are questions that cannot be answered with "yes" or "no"... ;-)
 > Why not?

Are you asking why are there questions that do not have binary answers? 
Jump over to a rhetoric discussion forum for that. Or go study some 
basic rhetoric, that might help.

z!



More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list