[FFmpeg-user] Why does the 'detelecine' filter exist?
Carl Zwanzig
cpz at tuunq.com
Thu May 29 07:26:15 EEST 2025
On 5/28/2025 2:37 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
>>>> There are probably extremely few instances where a name would
>>>> rationally
>>> be reused;
>>>
>>> Name even a single such instance, Carl. Name reuse to a better filter
>>> could be covered by the
>>> documentation.
>>>
>>
>> Your mission is failed.
>
> My challenge was to Carl.
Nope, it's your assertion (to reuse), you defend it. Experience tells us
that name reuse for different functionality does not end well.
As for "it ought to be documented", then get with it; ffmpeg is open
source- you can download the source, make patches, and see if they're
accepted. Do not ask me, or anyone else really, to do it for you. (And
please don't bother with the "I'm not a programmer" or similar stuff, if
you can get that far down into the weeds of video formats, a 'git clone'
+ edit + test + 'git send-email' (see
https://www.ffmpeg.org/developer.html#toc-Submitting-patches-1)
shouldn't be that difficult.
Later,
z!
(who doesn't answer to 'carl', so stop using it)
More information about the ffmpeg-user
mailing list