[Mplayer-cvslog] CVS: main/DOCS bugreports.html,1.31,1.32 cd-dvd.html,1.30,1.31 codecs.html,1.73,1.74 documentation.html,1.278,1.279 formats.html,1.36,1.37 sound.html,1.42,1.43 video.html,1.84,1.85

[Diego Biurrun]

Arpi writes:
 > > > Update of /cvsroot/mplayer/main/DOCS
 > > > In directory mail:/var/tmp.root/cvs-serv9467
 > > > 
 > > > Modified Files:
 > > > 	bugreports.html cd-dvd.html codecs.html documentation.html 
 > > > 	formats.html sound.html video.html 
 > > > Log Message:
 > > > 95% cosmetics (only paragraph reformatting, joe: ctrl-k-j :))
 > > 
 > > reversed. DE. sorry.
 > 
 > gabu said that cosmetics in docs html should not be reversed... what do you
 > think? i'm asking especially Diego and the doc translators...

I'm not fundamentally opposed to nice indentation, the HTML code looks
horrible at the moment and is not very readable.  The worst is that
most files do not have a consistent indentation style but switch from
2 spaces to no spaces and back constantly.

 > imho it makes impossible/hard to sync translations with a 150k, 95%
 > cosmetics patch...

The easy solution for this is not to mix cosmetics and "real" changes
in a single patch.  If cosmetics patches are just that they can be
safely ignored by the translators.

I already extracted the "real" changes from Gabucino's patch as I was
about to commit to documentation.html anyway.  I hope I did not miss
anything.

Let's hear the translators on this.

 > and there is some progress in html->xml, so we shouldn't make big changes,
 > especially not cosmetics ones on the html version since the fork.

I asked Andras to wait with the XML conversion until after 0.90 was
released so that we could freeze the docs a week or two for the
conversion.  It was already going out of sync.  Thus this should not
be a problem for the conversion.

Diego