[Mplayer-cvslog] CVS: main m_option.c,1.12,1.13

[Diego Biurrun]

Alban Bedel writes:
 > on Thu, 03 Jul 2003 00:02:48 +0200 you wrote:
 > > Alban Bedel writes:
 > >  > on Wed, 02 Jul 2003 18:51:45 +0200 you wrote:
 > >  > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
 > >  > > > on Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:27:15 +0200 you wrote:
 > >  > But this was at least broken in main, so i doubt it's fixed in
 > >  > main.
 > > 
 > > OK, I suppose you are confusing main and 0_90 again..
 > > 
 > > What is the problem?  Could you give some examples?  I get an error
 > > message instead of a crash if I have something like
 > > 
 > > dr=
 > > dr
 > > 
 > > in my config file now.
 > an error message instead of a crash, that's the fix :)

My tree printed an error message instead of crashing _before_ I
updated it to contain your change!

 > >  > > And what do you mean by backported to main?  You committed to main,
 > >  > > didn't you?
 > >  > Well ... i meant 0_90. It's just that i'm short on dsik space.So if
 > >  > someone who have a 0_90 tree could commit this 1 line fix that
 > >  > would be nice.
 > > 
 > > Here are the patches and commits:
 > > 
 > > main:
 > > http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-dev-eng/2003-June/019036.html
 > > http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-cvslog/2003-June/015350.html
 > > 
 > > 0_90:
 > > http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-dev-eng/2003-June/019079.html
 > > http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-cvslog/2003-June/015363.html
 > This is smthg else.

This is precisely what I am talking about.  I know for sure because I
was the original reporter of the crash back in march:

http://www.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-users/2003-March/031156.html

And it has been fixed in june..  So what did you fix?

Diego