[Mplayer-cvslog] CVS: main/DOCS/tech MAINTAINERS,1.38,1.39

Attila Kinali attila at kinali.ch
Sat Sep 4 03:08:29 CEST 2004


On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:38:08PM +0000, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> Ivan Kalvachev writes:
> > I don't think an maintainer could be somebody that cannot maintain
> > the code directly. So I think that he must have cvs write access
> > after he send him next patch and before the patch get commited.
> 
> Having CVS write access sure helps, but as long as he sticks around,
> reviews EDL patches, takes care of that part of the code and gets
> somebody to commit things for him he can have the title maintainer
> IMHO.

IMHO this is a policy question and IMHO Ivan is right.
Currently i use the MAINTAINERS file as a list on who has cvs write
access and whos patches i dont need to check as deeply as others. So if
we get people without cvs write access into MAINTAINERS we (ok, i) will
need another list with people who have cvs write access.

So, to sumarise this: IMHO only people with cvs write access should be
listed in MAINTAINERS. IMHO people like Reynaldo whould be given cvs
write access if they are willing to maintain a part of MPlayers code
base.

What do the others think ?


			Attila Kinali




More information about the MPlayer-cvslog mailing list