[MPlayer-cvslog] r26411 - trunk/libmpdemux/demuxer.c

Alban Bedel albeu at free.fr
Sun Apr 13 14:23:47 CEST 2008


On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:48:26 +0300
Uoti Urpala <uoti.urpala at pp1.inet.fi> wrote:

> On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 00:44 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:55:03 +0300
> > Uoti Urpala <uoti.urpala at pp1.inet.fi> wrote:
> > > So how did I waste anyone's time? It's plausible that someone
> > > could have a conflicting patch, but so far no one has mentioned
> > > that. That's a common pattern among the cases where someone
> > > complains about "breaking the rules": it's not that the commit
> > > prevented anyone else from doing development, but it's the
> > > flaming about it that wastes time. 
> > 
> > True. But what are we supposed to do when someone refuse to work as
> > was agreed. Would you prefer if your svn account was just terminated
> > without any warning? Hmm ... perhaps we should just have done that
> > earlier.
> 
> And exactly why would you need to do anything? Whatever is your idea
> of what "was agreed" why do you need to raise a fuss if someone
> doesn't do things the way you want when you can show no actual
> problem for development? You've done little development yourself in
> the last year, except some commits during the last few days. Why is
> it such a problem for you if someone does development in a different
> way than what you were used to?

Because you regularly commits stuff that you very well know is
controversial. You could do like everyone else, send a patch, wait a
bit, then commit. But you don't, and as I can hardly believe that your
understanding is so impaired, it can only be for the shake of trolling.

I'm not often very active on MPlayer as I have other projects I work on,
still as a maintainer I somewhat follow what is happening here, and your
obvious disregard of any rule is well documented. I think we all hoped
you would improve your behaviour with time, sadly nothing changed and
it's getting worse.

As you might have noticed I'm not the only one who think your behaviour
is not tolerable anymore. And the problem is not this very commit, but
your stubbornness in refusing to even considering changing your
behaviour. Up to now in this thread we have had: 1 dev threatening to
leave, 1 to fork, and 2 that asked for suspension of your svn account.
Now seeing that you just seems to think such trivialities doesn't
matter, you can add me to those voting for the suspension of your svn
account.

> > > So far my commits have overall improved MPlayer.
> > 
> > I don't disagree, still it is a subjective opinion and it is not
> > code you are maintaining.
> > 
> > > The complaints about not following traditional rules have not
> > > achieved anything positive.
> > 
> > You have achieved pissing off other developers, and some
> > responsible for quiet large parts of MPlayer. I'm pretty sure you
> > don't care, it was for the Greater Good after all.
> 
> And you think insisting on your "rules", for the sake of following
> rules, doesn't piss anyone off?

Stop trolling and realise that ppl only tolerated your behaviour up to
now. If you are too dim to understand that when you constantly push the
boundaries of tolerance, you should expect some back fire, I can't help
you.

	Albeu



More information about the MPlayer-cvslog mailing list